High Context and Low Context Communication
To compare both types
of communication, we have to analyze five terms, which are: Communication,
Emphasis, The responsible of the communication, Overtness and Expressions.
In the particular
case of the High Context, the communication is more based on the non verbal
communication, as the emphasis cares more about the context and the setting.
Also the responsibility of a good communication corresponds to the receptor of
the message. In the high context cultures, they focus more on the implicit
messages and the expression is more like a reserved reaction.
On the other hand,
the Low Context is based on a more verbal communication with emphasis in logic
and reasoning, also the responsibility of the good communication relies on the
sender of the message, rather than in the High context. Finally the
communication tends to be highly explicit and the expression cares more about
the external reactions.
Non verbal communication
As a way of
communication, the non verbal communication has also a socially shared meaning,
which can be intentional sent or interpretated and consciously sent or
received. Even though there is a general non verbal communication in the world,
it not always means the same, for instance the simple gesture of “okay” could
be interpreted as a bad word in another country.
We have been grown
surrounded by non verbal communication signs, for example the traffic signs as
the traffic light: We all know that red light means to stop and the green light
means to continue, but why?, how do we know that? It is because it is socially
shared meaning which we have assume and understand without the need of verbal
communication.
But not only the
gestures with the hands and the colors are non verbal communication, for
example one of the most accepted and understood gesture all over the world is
the smile of a baby.
Which theories exist about the perception of the change from the oral communication to the written communication?
There are two main
theories about this topic
The first one
involves the conception of a society that moved over from oral to written
communication as a need, developing cognitive skills and better brain
structure.
It also analyzes the
oral society as backward and worthless, which requires the invention of oral
writing to last over time. This theory is called the theory of the Great
dividing line
Moreover, the second
theory tells us about the equality of the types of communication, where both
forms of communication are equally valid and useful, for this reason named
after the theory of continuity.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario